THE PROHIBITION OF REFORMATIO IN PEJUS IN PENAL PROCEDURE
Abstract
HISTORY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROHIBITION OF REFORMATIO IN PEJUS. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NON REFORMATIO IN PEJUS. JUSTIFICATION BY THE HELP OF DIFFERENT THEORIES CONCERNING THE NATURE OF LEGAL REMEDIES, THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVE PRECEDENT, THE EQUITY OR THE ADOPTION OF PRO REO CRITERIA. DISTINCTION IN RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AS WELL AS LEGAL AND FACTUAL DETERIORATION. THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE ABOVENOTIONS. ANALYSIS OF THE WORSENING OF THE LEGAL MEANING OF DEED OF THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT LEGAL SYSTEMS CONCERNING THE PROBLEM OF DETERIORATION MEANING OF DEED. NOTION OF PROCEDURAL DETERIORATION AND MENTIONING OF CASES RELATING TO THE AUGMENTATION OF PENALTIES. WHICH IS THE NOTION OF AUGMENTATION OF PENALTIES AND HOW THE ABOVE COULD BE MEASURED. AREA OF APPLICATION OF NON REFORMATIO IN PEJUS LEGAL REMEDIES OF APPEAL OR REVISION. NON APPLICATION OF NON REFORMATIO IN PEJUS IN REFERENCE TO THE LEGAL REMEDIES IN PREJUDICATION. NON REFORMATIO IN PEJUS IS BEING IMPLEMENTED TOWARDS THE ACCUSE ...
show more
Download full text in PDF format (17.19 MB)
(Available only to registered users)
|
All items in National Archive of Phd theses are protected by copyright.
|
Usage statistics
VIEWS
Concern the unique Ph.D. Thesis' views for the period 07/2018 - 07/2023.
Source: Google Analytics.
Source: Google Analytics.
ONLINE READER
Concern the online reader's opening for the period 07/2018 - 07/2023.
Source: Google Analytics.
Source: Google Analytics.
DOWNLOADS
Concern all downloads of this Ph.D. Thesis' digital file.
Source: National Archive of Ph.D. Theses.
Source: National Archive of Ph.D. Theses.
USERS
Concern all registered users of National Archive of Ph.D. Theses who have interacted with this Ph.D. Thesis. Mostly, it concerns downloads.
Source: National Archive of Ph.D. Theses.
Source: National Archive of Ph.D. Theses.